IB Market Brief


As of: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:58 PM EDT

 

Click for a Summary Explanation

The IB Options and Futures Intelligence Report presents vital market information that is extremely useful to serious traders based on Interactive Brokers Group's experience of professionally trading the markets for nearly three decades. Option and futures pricing data has built-in information that provides the option and futures markets’ consensus outlook for subsequent activity in the markets. These leading indicators can provide a guide to traders and investors before news is widely disseminated to the public at large or reflected in underlying prices.

One of the most important of these indicators, implied volatility, represents the markets’ view of uncertainty associated with future price movements. When the current implied volatility is compared to the prior day’s implied volatility, a large increase can foretell unexpected news developments and provide an opportunity to adjust positions accordingly. This gain indicates that option market participants anticipate greater price movement than in the past, possibly because of information that is not yet readily available. Conversely a large decrease in implied volatility indicates the expectation of subsiding price movements, possibly because all recent news has been reflected in current underlying prices. Large premium or discount of implied volatility to historical volatility over the past 30 days is frequently not justified and may represent significant trading opportunities. Other options market data presented in our report such as volumes, and call/put ratios also plays a role in undersaanding sentiment in the markets.

For futures markets we present two measures: Synthetic EFP Rates and Futures Arbitrage Premium/Discount Index. The Synthetic EFP Rates highlight financing opportunities where entering into an Exchange for Physical (stock for single stock future swap) will provide a lucrative investment return or a very low borrowing rate. The Futures Arbitrage Premium/Discount Index highlights discrepancies between major index future contracts and their underlying fair value.

For the purpose of the tables, those options symbols with less than a $5 stock price, and less than 200 options contracts traded, and whose company has less than $1 billion in capital are screened out to eliminate symbols whose information may be more indicative of lack of liquidity in the markets. All tables, except the Fut Arb table, are posted hourly on each trading day from 11:45 to 15:45 ET (with a 15-minute market data delay) under normal circumstances. Tables are also posted at 16:15 ET to capture the market close. The Fut Arb table is updated every 15 minutes (with a 15-minute market delay), 12:00 AM Monday through 11:59 PM Friday. To view volatility and volume as well as other market summary statistics in real-time within our premier direct access trading platform, Trader Workstation, you must have an account with Interactive Brokers. Click "Open an Account" at the top right of the page.

Register for a free IB Options and Futures Intelligence Report Webinar. Print

Mouse over tabs below to view tables. Detailed explanations for each tab can be viewed in the text box below the tables.

 

 

Table Definition

Top Twenty 30-day (V30) Implied Volatilities

Implied volatility is the options market's prediction of how volatile a given underlying will be in the future. It is calculated by inputting all known information into an options pricing model (i.e. option price, interest rates, dividends, strike price, and expiry date) and backing out the unknown parameter, the implied volatility.

Twenty symbols with the highest implied volatilities are ranked in descending order and displayed on an annualized basis. Implied volatility is calculated using a 100-step binary tree for American style options, and a Black-Scholes model for European style options. Interest rates are calculated using the settlement prices from the day’s Eurodollar futures contracts, and dividends are based on historical payouts.

The IB 30-day volatility (V30) is the at market volatility estimated for a maturity thirty calendar days forward of the current trading day. It is based on option prices from two consecutive expiration months. The first expiration month is that which has at least eight calendar days to run. The implied volatility is estimated for the eight options on the four closest to market strikes in each expiry. The implied volatilities are fit to a parabola as a function of the strike price for each expiry. The at-the-market implied volatility for an expiry is then taken to be the value of the fit parabola at the expected future price for the expiry. A linear interpolation (or extrapolation, as required) of the 30-day variance based on the squares of the at market volatilities is performed. V30 is then the square root of the estimated variance. If there is no first expiration month with less than sixty calendar days to run we do not calculate a V30.

Closing price, and change in price from the prior day are also displayed.

Top Twenty Volatility Gainers and Losers

The current trading day’s 30-day Implied Volatility is divided by the prior trading day’s 30-day Implied Volatility to determine the change in volatility for the day and the top 20 gainers and losers are posted. Gainers are those symbols which the options markets believe will have the greatest up or down price movement in the future as compared to the past, and losers are those symbols which the options markets believe had a large up and down price movement and will stabilize in the future. Implied volatility, closing price, and change in price from the prior day are also displayed.

Top Twenty Options Volumes and Volumes Gainers

Options volumes for the day are displayed for the top twenty symbols with the highest volumes.

The trading day’s options volumes are divided by the previous ten trading day’s options volumes average and the top twenty gainers are posted by symbol.

Closing price, and change in price from the prior day are also displayed.

Implied vs. Historical Volatilities

The 30-day Implied Volatility is divided by the 30-day historical volatility. This ratio highlights those symbols in which the market prediction of future volatility is much different from the volatility in the market over the last 30 days. The formula for historical volatility as defined by Garman-Klass. The top twenty symbols with the highest ratios as well as the top twenty symbols with the lowest ratios are displayed.

Implied volatility, historical volatility, closing price, and change in price from the prior day are also displayed.

Top Twenty Put/Call Volume Ratios and Call/Put Volume Ratios

Put option volumes are divided by call option volumes for the trading day, and the symbols for the twenty highest ratios are displayed. For the put/call ratio, the HIGHER the value, the more negative the sentiment since it would indicate more puts traded than calls. A ratio of less than one indicates more call volume than put volume.

Call option volumes are divided by put option volumes for the trading day, and the symbols for the twenty highest ratios are displayed. For the call/put ratio, the HIGHER the value, the more positive the sentiment since it would indicate fewer puts trading than calls. A ratio of less than one indicates more put volume than call volume.

Closing price, and change in price from the prior day are also displayed.

Top Twenty Put/Call Open Interest and Call/Put Open Interest

Put option open interest is divided by call option open interest, and displayed for the top twenty symbols with the highest ratios. This ratio may indicate negative sentiment in the options market.

Call option open interest is divided by put option open interest, and are displayed for the top twenty symbols with the highest ratios. This ratio may indicate positive sentiment in the options market.

Open Interest ratios reflect a longer time period than Put/Call and Call/Put daily volume ratios and therefore tend to be less volatile.

Closing price, and change in price from the prior day are also displayed.

Synthetic EFP Rates

An Exchange for Physical (EFP) allows the swap of a long or short stock position for a Single Stock Future (SSF). SSFs have an interest rate built into their price that is determined competitively by numerous market participants. Like Repos and Reverse Repos in the debt markets, EFPs provide a cheap and efficient financing vehicle. The EFP transaction is one where you sell the stock and buy it back for future delivery by buying the SSF future, or you buy the stock and sell the SSF.

There are several reasons to use this type of transaction:

  1. If you carry a long stock position on margin, the EFP gives you the opportunity to reduce your financing cost because you will likely be able to sell the stock and buy the forward at a premium that is lower than your margin rate.
  2. If you are short the stock, you receive interest on the credit balance generated by your short sale, but this interest is less than the premium you would receive by selling the SSF and buying back the short stock.
  3. If you have excess cash in your account and would like to earn a higher return, you could buy stock and sell it forward at a premium higher than the interest your cash generates.

The tables above highlight the highest (investment opportunity) and lowest (borrowing opportunity) synthetic EFP rates available in the market. These synthetic rates are computed by taking the price differential between the SSF and the underlying stock, netting dividends, to calculate an annualized synthetic implied interest rate over the period of the SSF. All SSFs are settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, an AAA rated entity, making any interest earned through implied interest safer than with many other interest earning alternatives.

Futures Arbitrage Premium/Discount Index

The fair value of an index futures contract is computed by combining all the underlying values, adding an interest cost of carry for the duration of the futures contract, and subtracting any dividends that are paid during the duration of the futures contract. The table above compares near futures contracts with the fair value of the underlying representing a contract. When a futures price is greater than the fair value, there is a premium, indicating that the market believes there is a potential for increase in the underlying price or a decrease in the futures price. When a futures price is less than the fair value, there is a discount indicating the market believes there is a potential for a decrease in the underlying price or an increase in the futures price.

 

Written Commentary

As of: Friday September 10, 2010 at 2:40 pm

Hartford Financial Services Group call options in high demand

Today’s tickers: HIG, EW, GENZ, AWK, STEC, DELL, HTZ, DBRN & OVTI

HIG - Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. – Call options on the insurance and financial services firm are flying off the shelves today with shares trading higher by as much as 2.95% to tie down an intraday high of $22.99. As of 2:20 pm ET, more than 14.1 calls have changed hands on HIG for each single put option in action on the stock thus far in the session. The sharp increase in demand for calls bumped up the insurer’s overall reading of options implied volatility 26.4% to today’s high of 56.57%. While some investors populating HIG are selling calls, the majority of calls traded were purchased by traders positioning for continue appreciation in the price of the underlying shares. Near-term optimists picked up roughly 7,500 calls at the September $23 strike for an average premium of $0.50 each. Call buyers at this strike make money if HIG’s shares rally above the average breakeven price of $23.50 by expiration day next Friday. Other bulls purchased some 4,600 calls at the September $24 strike for premium of $0.23 each. Another 2,800 calls were scooped up at the higher September $25 strike at an average premium of $0.16 a-pop. More than 10,800 calls changed hands at the September $26 strike versus previously existing open interest of just 3,300 lots. The vast majority of those calls, some 7,000 contracts, traded to the middle of the market at a premium of $0.12 apiece. Bullish sentiment on the insurance company spread to the October $24 strike where some 2,000 calls were coveted at an average premium of $0.76 each. Investors holding these contracts stand ready to accumulate profits if HIG’s shares jump 7.7% over today’s high of $22.99 to exceed the average breakeven price of $24.76 by October expiration. An additional 2,000 calls were picked up at the October $25 strike for premium of $0.70 a-pop. Traders long the calls make money if shares surge 11.8% to trade above $25.70 ahead of expiration day next month. Options traders exchanged more than 66,700 contracts on Hartford Financial Services Group by 2:30 pm ET.

EW - Edwards Life Sciences Corp. – The provider of products and technologies created to treat advanced cardiovascular disease popped up on our ‘hot by options volume’ market scanner after one options player initiated a sizeable bearish transaction in the November contract. Shares of the medical supplies company are currently down 0.80% to arrive at $59.29 as of 1:55 pm ET. The investor established a ratio put spread, buying 5,000 puts at the November $57.5 strike at a premium of $2.95 each, and selling 10,000 puts at the lower November $47.5 strike for premium of $0.75 per contract. The net cost of the pessimistic play amounts to $1.45 each. Thus, the responsible party is poised to profit should Edwards Life Sciences’ shares decline 5.5% from the current price of $59.29 to slip beneath the effective breakeven price of $56.05 by expiration day in November. Maximum potential profits of $8.55 per contract pad the put-spreader’s wallet as long as the price of the underlying stock plummets 19.9% to settle at $47.50 at expiration. The sharp increase in demand for put options on EW lifted the stock’s overall reading of options implied volatility 7% to 40.64% by 2:00 pm ET.

GENZ - Genzyme Corp. – A three-legged bearish options combination play on biotechnology company, Genzyme Corp., caught our eye today. It looks like one strategist is bracing for Genzyme’s shares to decline ahead of expiration in January 2011 perhaps because Sanofi-Aventis, the French drugmaker looking to purchase the biotech firm, said it is not at this time raising the $69.00 a share or $18.5 billion offer as some rumors suggested earlier this week. Genzyme’s shares slipped 0.55% in morning trading, but recovered this afternoon to stand 0.15% higher on the day at $70.74 as of 1:45 pm ET. The investor responsible for the three-legged transaction sold approximately 5,000 calls at the January 2011 $72.5 strike for premium of $2.70 each, purchased the same number of puts at the January 2011 $67.5 strike at a premium of $3.35 apiece, and shed 10,000 puts at the January 2011 $60 strike for premium of $1.40 a-pop. The trader pockets $2.15 in premium per contract on the transaction, and keeps the full amount as long as shares fail to rally above $72.50 by expiration day in January. Additional profits amass should GENZ shares decline 4.6% from the current price of $70.74 to trade beneath the effective breakeven point to the downside at $67.50 by expiration. Maximum potential profits of $9.65 per contract, which includes premium pocketed today, are available to the investor if the biotechnology firm’s shares plunge 15.2% to settle at $60.00 at expiration next year.

AWK - American Water Works Co., Inc. – Shares of the provider of water and wastewater services to residential, commercial and industrial customers in the U.S. and Canada inched up 0.30% today to a high of $22.63. The firm appeared on our ‘hot by options volume’ market scanner during the second half of the session after one strategist initiated a bullish play in the December contract. It looks like the investor sold 3,000 puts at the December $22.5 strike to pocket premium of $1.00 apiece. The trader keeps the full premium received on the sale as long as American Water Works’ shares exceed $22.50 through expiration day in the final month of the year. Put selling, in this case, indicates the investor is happy to have shares of the underlying stock put to him at an effective price of $21.50 each in the event that puts land in-the-money at expiration.

STEC - STEC, Inc. – Call options on the global provider of enterprise-class Flash solid-state drives are in high demand today amid rumors personal-computer maker, Dell, may be interesting in making a bid for the company. STEC’s shares increased as much as 5.1% earlier to attain an intraday high of $12.18 before cooling slightly in afternoon trading to stand 2.00% higher on the day at $11.82 as of 1:10 pm ET. Investors hoping to see STEC extend gains ahead of September expiration picked up approximately 3,000 calls at the September $12 strike for an average premium of $0.35 each. Call buyers at this strike make money if shares rally 4.5% over the current price of $11.82 to surpass the average breakeven point to the upside at $12.35 by expiration day next Friday. Bullishness spread to the September $13 strike where traders purchased some 1,500 calls at an average premium of $0.18 a-pop. Investors long the calls are prepared to profit should STEC’s shares jump 11.5% to trade above the average breakeven price of $13.18 by September expiration. The overall reading of options implied volatility on the SSD maker stands 15.6% higher as of 1:15 pm ET to arrive at 62.42%.

DELL - Dell, Inc. – Shares of the world’s third-largest personal computer maker fell as much as 3.5% this morning to touch an intraday low of $11.69 after analysts at Morgan Stanley, citing global PC weakness due to tablet competition, cut their rating on Dell to ‘underweight’ from ‘equal-weight.’ One bearish options trader is positioning for shares to head lower ahead of October expiration, but does not appear to expect the stock to collapse any time soon. The investor initiated a ratio put spread, buying 4,100 now in-the-money puts at the October $12 strike at a premium of $0.55 each, and selling 8,200 puts at the lower October $11 strike for a premium of $0.21 apiece. Net premium paid to establish the ratio spread amounts to $0.13 per contract. Thus, the bearish player is poised to profit should Dell’s shares slip beneath the effective breakeven price of $11.87 by expiration day next month. Maximum potential profits of $0.87 per contract are available should shares shed another 8.00% to settle at $11.00 at expiration. In order to attain maximum profits on the position, shares of the underlying stock must fall through the current 52-week low of $11.34, set on August 24, 2010.

HTZ - Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. – Bullish options traders are loading up on Hertz Global call options this morning to position for a substantial medium-term rally in the price of the underlying shares. The second-largest U.S. car rental company’s shares rallied 3.05% in the first half of the trading session to secure an intraday high of $10.11. Share price appreciation today follows reports Thursday that a request by investors in Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc., Hertz’s $1 billion proposed takeover target, to stop a September 16 shareholder vote regarding the sale of the company to Hertz was rejected by a Delaware judge. Dollar Thrifty shareholders sought an injunction in order to reconsider a competing bid from Avis Budget Group, Inc. Bullish options players, perhaps emboldened by the judge’s decision, flocked to Hertz in morning trading to prepare for shares to head higher in the remainder of 2010. Investors purchased at least 12,200 calls at the December $12.5 strike for an average premium of $0.57 each. Call buyers stand ready to make money should HTZ shares surge 29.3% in the next several months to exceed the average breakeven price of $13.07 by December expiration. Hertz’s shares last traded above $13.07 back on May 13, 2010.

DBRN - Dress Barn, Inc. – Bulls are trying call options on for size at Dress Barn today to position for shares of the operator of women’s apparel specialty stores to rally ahead of September expiration. Investors are likely taking bullish stance on DBRN ahead of the firm’s fourth-quarter earnings report scheduled for release after the closing bell on September 15, 2010. Dress Barn’s shares are currently up 0.30% to stand at $22.71 as of 12:30 pm ET. It looks like traders picked up approximately 1,500 in-the-money calls at the September $22.5 strike for an average premium of $0.90 apiece. Call buyers profit if the retailer’s shares rally 3.00% over the current price of $22.71 to exceed the effective breakeven price of $23.40 ahead of expiration next Friday. Options implied volatility on the stock is up 5.6% at 41.65% in early afternoon trading.

OVTI - OmniVision Technologies, Inc. – Shares in semiconductor image sensor devices manufacturer, OmniVision Technologies, fell as much as 7.2% in the first half of the trading day to reach an intraday low of $18.42, the lowest traded price since June 11. It looks like one options investor was prepared for the plunge in price and took profits off the table by rolling a previously established long put stance to a lower strike price in the October contract. The put player likely accumulated a total of 3,000 long puts at the October $24 strike for an average premium of $2.58 each starting on August 30, 2010, when OVTI shares were trading at a volume-weighted average price of $22.47. The subsequent erosion in the price of the underlying stock inflated premium on the deep-in-the-money puts. Thus, the investor was able to sell all 3,000 puts at that strike today at a richer premium of $4.70 a-pop. Net profits on the closing sale amount to an average of $2.12 per contract. Next, the trader braced for continued bearish movement in the price of OVTI shares by picking up a fresh batch of 3,000 in-the-money puts at the lower October $20 strike at a premium of $1.90 apiece. Profits on the new position start to accumulate for the investor if the semiconductor maker’s shares fall another 1.7% from today’s low of $18.42 to trade below the average breakeven price of $18.10 by October expiration day.


Andrew Wilkinson
Senior Market Analyst
ibanalyst@interactivebrokers.com

Caitlin Duffy
Equity Options Analyst


My Yahoo Add to Google Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe with Newsgater Subscribe with Netvibes XML Twitter

The material presented in this commentary is provided for informational purposes only and is based upon information that is considered to be reliable. However, neither Interactive Brokers LLC nor its affiliates warrant its completeness, accuracy or adequacy and it should not be relied upon as such. Neither IB nor its affiliates are responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained from the use of this information. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities or other financial instruments mentioned in this material are not suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their issue. The information contained herein does not constitute advice on the tax consequences of making any particular investment decision. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation to you of any particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. Before investing, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

 

Risk appetite fails to gain traction

Friday September 10, 2010


Risk appetite has the ability but apparently little desire to self-improve at the end of the week. The huge sucking sound of Chinese imports in to its nation’s ports helped relax fears over an impending slowdown in the pace of global recovery. A stimulus package from Tokyo also helped soothe investors’ nerves while the safe haven appeal of Swiss franc and Japanese yen came off the boil. But markets are showing some restraint in going hell-for-leather again today, as if something unsavory is bubbling away in the background.


09-10-2010 04:07 PM EDT Current Price Put Open Int Weekly Change in Put Open Int Call Open Int Weekly Change in Call Open Int Put/Call Open Int Ratio 30-day Historical Vol (%) Implied Volatility (%)
Euro  Euro 1.2696 27,521 433 18,815 1,723 1.5 10.4 10.5
Yen  Yen 84.1725 10,876 235 2,948 239 3.7 10.7 11.8
Pound  Pound 1.5353 9,444 67 3,690 27 2.6 9.3 9.7
Canada  Canada 0.9656 10,507 132 10,566 -125 1.0 10.8 10.9
Aussie  Aussie 0.9264 9,847 162 21,696 67 0.5 12.8 11.8
Swiss  Swiss 1.0194 3,711 8 6,360 479 0.6 12.0 10.6

Canadian dollar – The Canadian dollar has recoiled from its intraday peak against the dollar at 97.00 U.S. cents. The rebound marks a three-and-a-half cent gain so far this month as broader market nervousness has receded. The catalyst for today’s rally is a labor market update report reminiscent of that released earlier in the week in Australia. Although more people joined the labor market through the end of August accounting for a tick upwards in the rate of unemployment to 8.1%, Canadian employers added a greater than expected 35,800 positions in the month. Educational roles accounted for a good slice of the data. But the striking thing about this number, just as with Australian data, is the surge in full-time positions, which rose by 79,900 while part-time employment shrank by 44,100 positions. The central bank’s increase in interest rates this week may well not be the last should such a trend continue. The dollar came off its peak to trade at 96.83 cents an hour after the release as dealers digested the report.

Aussie dollar – The Aussie shook off yesterday’s slump rising from 92.05 U.S. cents to 92.67 cents following the positive reading on China’s trade surplus. An August surplus was the third consecutive reading above $20 billion in as many months and comes as the pace of imports rose by 35% year-on-year indicating a pick-up in activity. The Australian dollar also made gains against the yen to ¥77.90 as the yen suffered on all crosses overnight.

Japanese yen – Most economists have had to admit recently that the string of global data is not as bad as they’d feared shifting focus away from talk of a double-dip recession. It has been a hard task to divert portfolio flows into the yen during this time, however, leaving the Japanese in something of a pickle. Currency intervention has been mulled but carries an unsure outcome. The government has not been shy in saying this and has dragged its heels over whether it should go it alone. Next week sees a showdown as politicians vote to decide whether Ichiro Ozawa should replace DPJ leader and Prime Minister Naoto Kan. In a Tokyo debate between the two today the thorny question of intervention was raised. Kan relayed that Japan would likely have to go it alone because both Europe and the U.S. would be content to see their currencies weaken to promote exports. He appeared to apologize in advance for the impact that yen selling would have on outside interests. The Prime Minister also unveiled an $11 billion stimulus initiative aimed at boosting consumption and employment and held out the prospects for a further package before year-end. The yen weakened per dollar to ¥84.32.

Euro – The euro remains higher against the dollar but is making a swift retreat from an earlier high at $1.2750. ECB chief Trichet told the Financial Times that it’s an awkward task shaking borrowers off its emergency lending program, which was recently extended into 2011. Colleague Ordonez poured some cold water on the risk rally by offering the view that there could be further disruptions to financial markets and said that banks should continue to think about strengthening their financial infrastructure. Shares in almighty Deutsche Bank slipped 5% in European trading as stories swirled that the bank would issue €9 billion in share capital. The euro is now struggling with the $1.2700 watershed.

British pound – Inflationary pressures cooled off in August according to a producer price report released earlier, but the boost to the pound has long since evaporated. The cost of goods leaving the factory gate rose by a smaller than expected 4.7% on the year ago, while the cost of raw material inputs reversed course as the pound gained ground during the month. The pound has now lower at $1.5395 having reached $1.5467 in response to the earlier data.

U.S. Dollar – The dollar is once again flexing its muscles and its index is 0.2% firmer at 82.81. It’s breaking higher against fellow safety valves of the Swiss franc and Japanese yen as stock market sentiment edges ahead. Yet at the same time it’s tearing chunks out of the usual harbingers of prosperity of the Aussie and Canadian dollars. European units are left floundering. It’s hard to say that risk is at all off the agenda given the fact that pre-market equity index futures remain firm. Something somewhere is lurking. We just can’t see it yet.

Andrew Wilkinson
Senior Market Analyst
ibanalyst@interactivebrokers.com

My Yahoo Add to Google Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe with Newsgater Subscribe with Netvibes XML

Note: The material presented in this commentary is provided for informational purposes only and is based upon information that is considered to be reliable. However, neither Interactive Brokers LLC nor its affiliates warrant its completeness, accuracy or adequacy and it should not be relied upon as such. Neither IB nor its affiliates are responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained from the use of this information. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities or other financial instruments mentioned in this material are not suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their issue. The information contained herein does not constitute advice on the tax consequences of making any particular investment decision. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation to you of any particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. Before investing, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

Stocks up – bonds down

Friday September 10, 2010


U.S., European and Japanese bond prices have each made new weekly lows on Friday morning as investors shun the need for the safety of fixed income following signs that the double-dipper crew is being forced to take a break from predicting more recession. Yields are rising by the most in six months to end the week on a sour note for bonds.

As of: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:58 PM EDT

 

Moody's Ratings Overview

Moody's Investor Service rates the long-term debt of many companies and assigns its bonds a rating, adopting a two-tier structure to discern between two types of ratings. The system creates a watershed for investors wanting to distinguish between Investment Grade and Non-Investment Grade corporate bonds. Some investors will only invest in a specific quality of bonds that are awarded a sufficiently high rating by one of several ratings agencies.Other agencies include Standard & Poors and Fitch & Co.

Investment Grade are the highest rated corporate bonds and in the opinion of the ratings agency are less likely to default on their principal and coupon repayments than companies whose bonds are rated Non-Investment Grade. Typically, Investment Grade rated corporate bonds carry lower yields than Non-Investment Grade bonds. The cost of raising capital is therefore higher to companies with weaker ratings and reflects the associated risks of investments.

The current Moody's rating scale ranks Investment Grade corporate bonds from the highest ratings to the lowest in the following order: Aaa, Aa1, Aa2, Aa3, A1, A2, A3, Baa1, Baa2, Baa3.

Non-Investment Grade corporate bonds are rated from the highest ratings to the lowest in the following order: Ba1, Ba2, Ba3, B1, B2, B3, Caa1, Caa2, Caa3, Ca and C.

A reading of WR defines a rating that has been withdrawn by Moody's indicating that it is not currently rated by the agency.


Eurodollar futures – U.S. 10-year yields have risen by 11 basis points on the week and are set to close at around 2.80% compared to a recent slide to 2.42% in the last week of August. The reversal in deferred Eurodollar contracts continues uninterrupted today with the 2012 strip showing a five basis point rise in implied yields. The contract expiring in December 2012 touched its lowest point at 98.25 (1.75%) since August 10 as rate expectations take something of a beating today. The most recent slide started after the contract reached a high on Wednesday at 98.515 (1.485%) and adds a full quarter point on rate expectations. Two-year treasury yields rose seven basis points this week to stand at 0.58%.

Japanese bonds - The rise in the cost of government debt sales rose for a third week in a row as the December JGB contract slumped 46 ticks to 141.16 where the yield rose to 1.145%. Second quarter growth data released overnight was up a tiny amount on a provisional forecast while machinery tool orders surged last month. Producer prices were unexpectedly static through August on a monthly and annualized basis calming fears that prices would continue to deflate. The fact that they didn’t harmed fixed income prices, which grow in appeal in an environment of falling prices.

Australian bills – Strong import data out of China was enough to persuade investors that things might once again be looking firmer in Australia’s biggest export market. Implied yields rose a further four basis points according to price declines evident in 90-day bill futures prices. Government bond prices decayed sending the yield higher by four basis points to 5.031%. Pressure on money market yields has been reinforced by a recovery in the value of the Australian dollar and inherent in firm employment data released earlier in the week. Both signal an increasing likelihood that the RBA has more wiggle room in monetary policy nowadays. Its efforts to cool the economy were temporarily thwarted by a sharp drop-off in economic activity especially in North America.

Canadian bills - An unexpectedly sharp gain in payrolls at Canadian employers during August could easily have triggered expectations of further monetary tightening at the Bank of Canada. The report showed a jump in full-time employment leading to a net employment change of 35,800 for the month. However, as more people joined the labor market the rate of unemployment rose to 8.1% perhaps comforting for investors concerned over more calls for tighter policy. Bill prices are just now giving up an earlier gain on the day and stand unchanged on Thursday’s trading while a resilient government bond futures contract remains in positive territory sending yields down by a pip to 2.943%.

European bond markets - Bunds continue to look pretty sick on the chart after a relentless run higher in prices ended this week. December bunds are lower by 70 ticks at 130.08 and not a million miles short of the bear flag target I indicated in yesterday’s brief. The pattern took slightly longer to break, but the move is clear on the charts. ECB chief Trichet noted the difficulty of weaning European banks off emergency lending programs, while another member warned on further disruptions to financial markets presumably should banks encounter further difficulties. Overall it’s a bad scenario for bunds where yields rose again to 2.37%.

British gilts - Losses for short sterling futures appear to accelerating into the close for the weekend, despite a lull in producer prices in today’s data. Input prices unexpectedly declined while output prices didn’t rise as far as analysts had predicted ahead of the report. December gilts fell sharply with the contract currently down by 67 ticks at 122.49 yielding 3.093%.

Andrew Wilkinson
Senior Market Analyst
ibanalyst@interactivebrokers.com


My Yahoo Add to Google Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe with Newsgater Subscribe with Netvibes XML

Note: The material presented in this commentary is provided for informational purposes only and is based upon information that is considered to be reliable. However, neither Interactive Brokers LLC nor its affiliates warrant its completeness, accuracy or adequacy and it should not be relied upon as such. Neither IB nor its affiliates are responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained from the use of this information. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities or other financial instruments mentioned in this material are not suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their issue. The information contained herein does not constitute advice on the tax consequences of making any particular investment decision. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation to you of any particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. Before investing, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

ETFs Brief


As of 09-10-2010 04:15 PM EDT
Sector Ticker Current Price % Change in Price Total OI Current P/C OI ratio Current C/P OI ratio % Change in Monthly Put OI % Monthly Change in Call OI Opt Implied Volatility Current Option Volume
Financial XLF 14.52 0.07 5,905,526 1.5 0.7 5.32 11.35 26.55% 95,540
Energy XLE 54.51 1.02 1,392,861 1.2 0.8 16.05 14.93 23.23% 19,016
Technology XLK 21.74 0.05 982,287 1.8 0.6 3.02 11.95 20.46% 27,465
Industrials XLI 30.40 0.90 959,894 2.0 0.5 3.13 1.43 23.63% 4,118
Retail XRT 38.65 0.70 926,254 2.4 0.4 7.15 30.84 28.21% 55,354
Materials XLB 32.86 0.95 893,825 2.2 0.5 2.65 0.08 23.65% 7,060
Homebuilding XHB 15.18 0.73 776,451 0.6 1.6 -2.92 3.97 34.91% 7,847
Consumer Discretionary XLY 32.30 0.87 717,495 2.7 0.4 2.00 3.56 23.37% 18,182
HealthCare XLV 29.77 1.02 591,231 2.1 0.5 1.51 1.84 15.51% 4,186
Staples XLP 27.52 0.47 519,256 1.6 0.6 4.11 11.15 12.07% 1,092
Utilities XLU 31.50 -0.38 337,107 1.2 0.8 0.87 4.27 16.79% 3,345

Andrew Wilkinson
Senior Market Analyst
ibanalyst@interactivebrokers.com

Note: The material presented in this commentary is provided for informational purposes only and is based upon information that is considered to be reliable. However, neither Interactive Brokers LLC nor its affiliates warrant its completeness, accuracy or adequacy and it should not be relied upon as such. Neither IB nor its affiliates are responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained from the use of this information. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities or other financial instruments mentioned in this material are not suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only correct as of the stated date of their issue. The information contained herein does not constitute advice on the tax consequences of making any particular investment decision. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation to you of any particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. Before investing, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.